🔗 Share this article

Each time a major awards ceremony approaches, you'll find a clamor for introducing additional classifications to honor overlooked contributions and fill the hearts of followers dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. That would be fantastic. So would board games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist for pushing forward because like all blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case for why my demand is the most urgent above others. This is the request: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions is not a science; opinions vary greatly, and typically spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents an essential concession for the industry of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of gaming accomplishments to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these six categories actually cover many game types, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

Not so for puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to put them. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. Where could they possibly go among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist of brilliant puzzle games published annually without proper recognition in entertainment awards, if they accidentally match award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

• One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated completely in 2014
• Another imaginative release was excluded in 2019
• A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment that year
• Limited numbers of puzzle games barely qualified for independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, but the art behind logic titles is of massive significance. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences globally and have been for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with famous sandbox experiences for the title of most purchased experience; it additionally competes as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. You could fill five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these are games without proper classification in important events. Brain-teaser creators operate at the hard edge interactive creation, creating some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Just like cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay generations.